« REVIEW The Republic, Or, My Dinner With Socrates, adapted and directed by Viot Hořejš, The Czechoslovak-American Marionette Theatre, LaMaMa in association with Goh Productions | Main | REVIEW The Night Alive, written and directed by Conor McPherson, The Donmar Warehouse Production at the AtlanticTheater »

December 24, 2013


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference REVIEW The [curious case of the] Watson Intelligence by Madeleine George, directed by Leigh Silverman, Playwrights Horizons:


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I agree with you that this was a very boring play. However, to my way of thinking, it was a sinister play for it advocated that people should be happy in playing a supporting role – not unlike the handmaidens of Margaret Atwood’s novel. More surprising the play was written by a woman when it is really a put down for women. Some of the philosophy is almost from Nietzsche but without the power. One wonders how so much resource was spent for this? Are there better uses for the limited money for the arts?

Hi Yvonne,

I would like to send you a press release & info on Tony n' Tina's Wedding performance that is coming back to Times Square this winter! Please let me know what email address to send to.

Thank you!

While I agree "The (curious case of) The Watson Intelligence" was flawed, I think it had far more to offer than this conversation has so far allowed. To me the point is not that "people should be happy in playing a supporting role"--it's not prescriptive in that way. There are two ongoing and intersecting explorations. One is of what we create when we try to create the "perfect" other; the second is the need to learn to value the kind of "genius" that allows one person to back another without seeking the spotlight. I always enjoy a role reversal of the Pygmalion myth--what does a woman create when she creates the "perfect" man? And I enjoyed this idea of "The Watson Intelligence"--not the intelligence GIVEN TO a Watson to make "him" perfect, but the native intelligence that knows how to reflect and shape the more commonly acknowledged "genius." Of course the playwright was trying to unhook the concept from the usual gender roles--a complex task, not fully achieved. I was entertained by all the different pairings, however, and only disappointed by the ending, which seemed far too simplistic for the questions raised. After complicating the issue of HOW to connect--do we enjoy the "perfect" other we create? can we afford to acknowledge the intelligence that feeds and shapes our own without feeling it is controlling us?--the ending I saw (in previews; don't know if it survived the run) seemed to flatten everything into an uncomplicated "Only connect."

... the reversal of the Pygmalion myth ... I'm trying to think of others earlier than this one ... what might they be ... ?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)